Better, worse, or just different than Steve Jobs? The keynote presentation was done in classic Apple fashion with a number of videos inspiring the public to buy each and every one of Apple's products. Five years ago, however, the late Steve Jobs taking to the stage would have followed those videos. It's easy to criticize Cook for what has gone wrong since he took the role.
This case is about US-based consumer electronics company Apple, Inc's Appleknown for its ability to come out with path-breaking products.
Experts have associated the innovation at Apple with its corporate culture. The case discusses in detail the corporate culture at Apple.
At Apple, the work culture was driven by a passion for new products with no end to challenges and opportunities.
The corporate culture at Apple was exemplified by its intense work ethics. Though the work environment was relaxed and casual, there was a very strong commitment to deadlines. Analysts summarized the work culture at Apple as "fun, yet demanding". The case talks about how employees at Apple had to run their own show and work in a challenging and creative environment.
Apple adopted a style that was not too formal or hierarchical and a more results-driven approach which worked best for them. The case also focuses on the career opportunities and employability security, compensation, and benefits offered to the employees by the company.
The case explains how Apple fostered a culture of secrecy. The demand for absolute secrecy and insistence on control were infused into the company culture right from the beginning. The various dysfunctional aspects of Apple's culture which led the company to the brink of disaster are also discussed.
While some appreciated Apple's culture saying that it valued creative people, others felt that it was dysfunctional from a management standpoint and was largely influenced by its CEO Steve Jobs Jobs who had a very quirky style. Experts felt that Apple's obsession with maintaining secrecy could hurt the company and its brand in the new milieu.
They felt that the biggest challenge for Apple was to move out from under the shadow of Jobs. The performance of the company in his absence was a key concern for all stakeholders, they said.
The case concludes by discussing whether a change in the company's culture is required to remain competitiveness in the long run.His management style wasn’t the stuff of university Textbooks, he wasn’t known for his consultative or consensus building approach.
He was a “High-maintenance Co-worker” who demanded excellence from his stuff and was known for his blunt delivery of criticism. Among the three main management styles (autocratic, consultative and democratic), the consultative management style is where managers consult other team members before arriving at a decision.
This is in contrast to autocratic management style wherein the manager gives instructions. Sachin Agarwal learned a lot about Apple's management style during his days as an engineer.
He worked at the company for 6 years, before leaving to start the simple blogging platform Posterous. You see, the late Steve Jobs, the founder of Apple, liked to keep management simple. He did not like layers of high-level people, and the company keeps the same management style.
Apple’s organizational structure is effective in supporting business performance to ensure leadership in the industry, especially with regard to competing against Google, Microsoft, IBM, Intel, pfmlures.com, Sony, PayPal, and many other firms.
Working for Apple may seem like a dream job for anyone interested in the latest technology. In fact, many employees contend it has .